I got an email recently from “Loren,” who sought to inform me,
By Tom Gilson at Thinking Christian
Science is knowledge of proven facts, religion is a belief system based on unproven theory. The matter is closed, science is alive and growing where as religion is based on ancient history.
That’s all she wrote. (I know both men and women named Loren, so I’ll take a random stab at it and use female pronouns. If I’m wrong on that I’ll make the correction, with apologies.)
I’ll say one thing for this message: it’s a marvel of pithy communication. In just two sentences it expresses a mood that pervades the very atmosphere of our modern Western world. It wafts through the air of our universities, rarely noticed, rarely questioned.
For that reason it calls for a serious response. It cannot be lightly dismissed, even though (unfortunately for Loren), there is almost nothing of substance in it. It certainly has little to offer by way of factual accuracy. I want to take a moment to explain why I say that, and then later, in a follow-up post, I’ll take a closer look at the mood of the message.
“Science Is Knowledge of Proven Facts”
I’ll start with with her description of science. Science certainly deals with proven facts; or at least it does for those who accept scientific realism and are willing to waffle on nuances like the fact that, once upon a time, Newtonian physics was thought to be proven. To say that’s what science is, however, is to diminish considerably what science deals with. I don’t know of any actual scientist who would be happy with that as a definition. (Instrumentalists and other anti-realists would take particularly strong exception to it.)
Based on Unproven Theory
But maybe Loren wasn’t speaking definitionally. She goes on to mention what it is she thinks religion is based on, so maybe she means science is based on proven facts. That’s doubtful, too, unfortunately, whether she means science is historically, methodologically, or theoretically based on proven facts.