Why Is Evolution So Widely Believed? by William Lane Craig

This question was posed to Dr. Craig at Reasonable Faith:

Dear Dr. Craig,

I love your work and your tireless efforts to spread the message of Christ in  a intelligent, articulate manner! You have personally brought me to faith in  Christ and delivered me, through your various articles and debates, from an  atheistic-induced existential depression ( I really contemplated suicide for I  thought: Since there is no afterlife… might as well go into oblivion  sooner….. ); and for that I cannot thank you enough!

I have 3 questions.

1) Regarding the theory of evolution, why is it so widely accepted in  mainstream science? While I am steadfast in the fact that evolution cannot  disprove the existence of God; I cannot seem to find any evidence clearly  showing the general process of simple organisms evolving into more complex ones.  Furthermore, there seems to be a consensus among geologists that the Earth is  roughly 6 billion years old, whereas I hear Young Earth Creationists stating  that the Earth is only 6 thousand years old. Who is right?

2) If evolution is true, then why didn’t God write Genesis differently? Just  a simple ” and little organisms changed over time ” would certainly clear up all  the conflict between Creationists and Evolutionists and prevent people from  thinking that the Bible is against science or something. In line with this  thinking, why didn’t God put the Big Bang Cosmology theory in Genesis? ” In the  beginning, the universe was a hot dense state. Then, it expanded! ”

3) What is going to happen to the Reasonable faith ministry should you retire  or be called to be with Christ? Is it going to continue under another  scholar(s)? Or will it ceased to exist? ( the horror! =D)

Please give me links or additional information regarding these topics

Once again, I really thank you for your work and pray that God blesses and  keeps you, and everything you hold dear, well.

Warm Regards,


United  States

I’m thrilled to hear that your life is now on a good track, Tim!  I’ll  respond to your questions in order.

(1) Why is the theory of evolution so widely accepted in mainstream  science?  I think the short answer is that it’s the best naturalistic  theory we’ve got.  If, as a result of methodological naturalism, the pool of  live explanatory options is limited to naturalistic hypotheses, then, at least  until recently, the neo-Darwinian theory of biological evolution driven by the  mechanisms of genetic mutation and natural selection was, as Alvin Plantinga  puts it, the only game in town.  Rival naturalistic hypotheses could not equal  its explanatory power, scope, and plausibility.  No matter how improbable it  seems, no matter how enormously far the explanatory power of its mechanisms must  be extrapolated beyond the testable evidence, no matter the lack of evidence for  many of its tenets, it has to be true because there isn’t any other naturalistic  theory that comes close.

It’s helpful to remind ourselves that the word “evolution” is an  accordion-word that can be expanded or contracted to suit the occasion.  The  evolutionary biologist Francisco Ayala points out that the word “evolution” can  be used to mean at least three different things:

1. The process of change and diversification of living things over time.  It  is in this sense that biologists say that evolution is a fact.  But obviously  this fact, so stated, is innocuous and would not be disputed even by the most  fundamentalist Young Earth Creationist.

2. Reconstruction of evolutionary history, showing how various lineages  branched off from one another on the universal tree of life.

3. The mechanisms which account for evolutionary change. Darwin appealed to  natural selection operating on random variations in living things in order to  explain the adaptedness of organisms to their environment.  With the development  of modern genetics, genetic mutations came to supplement the Darwinian mechanism  of natural selection by supplying an explanation for the variations on which  natural selection works.  Accordingly, we can call this hypothesis “neo-Darwinism.”

Read more: http://www.reasonablefaith.org/why-is-evolution-so-widely-believed#ixzz2C1bphlUV


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.