Would Jesus Say “I’m Spiritual, But Not Religious?”

I’m not into organized religion. I’m into believing in a higher source of creation, realizing we’re all just part of nature.Neil Young

Most recently, there was an article by Alan Miller on the CNN Belief blog called “My Take: ‘I’m spiritual but not religious’ is a cop-out

Miller says:

“The increasingly common refrain that “I’m spiritual, but not religious,” represents some of the most retrogressive aspects of contemporary society. The spiritual but not religious “movement” – an inappropriate term as that would suggest some collective, organizational aspect – highlights the implosion of belief that has struck at the heart of Western society.

Spiritual but not religious people are especially prevalent in the younger population in the United States, although a recent study has argued that it is not so much that people have stopped believing in God, but rather have drifted from formal institutions.

It seems that just being a part of a religious institution is nowadays associated negatively, with everything from the Religious Right to child abuse, back to the Crusades and of course with terrorism today.”

To read the entire article, click here:

In my own outreach efforts, I have heard the “I’m spiritual, but not religious” comment as well. While I expect this comment to come  from New Agers or someone outside the Christian faith, I am saddened when I hear it among professed Christians. So if someone professes to be a follower of Jesus and thinks being spiritual but not religious is the way to go, my thoughts are that it is time to take a look at what Jesus would say about this topic.

Let’s take a look a comment by Anthony J. Saldarini:

“To wrench Jesus out of his Jewish world destroys Jesus and destroys Christianity, the religion that grew out of his teachings. Even Jesus’ most familiar role as Christ is a Jewish role. If Christians leave the concrete realities of Jesus’ life and of the history of Israel in favor of a mythic, universal, spiritual Jesus and an otherworldly kingdom of God, they deny their origins in Israel, their history, and the God who has loved and protected Israel and the church. They cease to interpret the actual Jesus sent by God and remake him in their own image and likeness. The dangers are obvious. If Christians violently wrench Jesus out of his natural, ethnic and historical place within the people of Israel, they open the way to doing equal violence to Israel, the place and people of Jesus. This is a lesson of history that haunts us all at the end of the 20th century.” (1)

So in light of the Jewish context of the life of Jesus, let’s make some observations:

Jesus observed the Jewish Feasts of His day

As an observant Jew, Jesus observed Passover (John 2:13)  The Feast of Sukkot (John 7: 2, 10),  Hanukah  (The Feast of Dedication) (John 10:22) and probably Rosh Hashanah (John 5:1).

Also, Jesus revered the Temple and ceremonial worship (Jn. 2:16) and taught in the synagogue: (Lk.4:14-20; Jn. 18:20).

Jesus was concerned with Holiness

As Scot McKnight says:

“At no place have Christians been more insensitive to Judaism that when it comes to what Jesus believes and teaches about God. In particular, the concept that Jesus was the first to teach about God as Abba and that this innovation revealed that Jesus thought of God in terms of love while Jews thought of God in terms of holiness, wrath, and distance are intolerably inaccurate in the realm of historical study and, to be quite frank, simple pieces of bad polemics. The God of Jesus was the God of Israel, and there is nothing in Jesus’ vision of God that is not formed in the Bible he inherited from his ancestors and learned from his father and mother” (7) “Countless Christians repeat the Lord’s Prayer. When Jesus urged His followers to “hallow” or “sanctify” the Name of God (Matt 6:9), many are unaware of what that may have meant in Jesus’ day- in part, because Christianity has lost sight of God’s awesome splendorous holiness. A good reading of Amos 2:6-8 discusses this issue. “Reverencing the Name of God” is not just how Israel speaks of God-that it does not take the Name of God in vain when it utters oaths or when someone stubs a toe or hits a finger with an instrument -but that God’s Name is profaned when Israel lives outside the covenant and by defiling the name of God in it’s behavior” (Jer 34:15-46; Ezek. 20:39; Mal 1:6-14). God’s Name is attached to the covenant people, and when the covenant people lives in sin, God’s Name is dragged into that sin along with His people. So, when Jesus urges his followers to “reverence,” or “sanctify” the Name of God, he is thinking of how his disciples are to live in the context of the covenant: they are to live obediently as Israelites.” (2)

Jesus was concerned with Righteousness

McKnight says again:

“When most Christians think of this term, they are faced with two problems: First, that the apostle Paul used this term so much in the sense of “imputed” righteousness and did so in an innovative, however, effective, manner; and second, that is what the cognate in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek is not so in English. Fundamentally, the term “righteousness” along with its cognates, describes an Israelites relationship to God and his Torah, and that relationship is conceived in its behavioral categories: the righteous Israelite is one who does Torah as a covenant member (Deut 6:25; Job 22:6-93; Ps 1:4-6; Ezek.45:9) Jesus teaches about such righteousness as did his Jewish ancestors, as well as John (Luke 3:7-14; Matt 21:28-32), to describe those Jewish followers of his who wholeheartedly conformed their obedience to Torah, as taught by him (Matt 5:17-48), in the context of renewal of the covenant taking place though his offer of the kingdom.”  (3)

But Didn’t Jesus Reject Hypocrisy and Formalism?

“It is true that Jesus condemned  the hypocrisy of some religious leaders – those who took such a strong stand on the letter of the law but were leaving behind the spirit of the law. There is a misconception that Jesus utterly rejects the Pharisees and the Teachers of the Law. But although Jesus does condemn their sternness and hypocrisy, He rejects neither their function nor their teaching. This is clearly seen when Jesus says “The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. So you must obey them and do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach.” (Mt. 23:2-3) (4)

Note: To read more about the relationship between Jesus and the Pharisees (which is generally misunderstood by many Christians), see Scot McKnight’s posts here. 

What About Individualism vs Community?

When I hear the “I’m spiritual, but not religious” from Christians, this generally translates as ” I don’t need to be in a community or local congregation. I do my own thing.” This leads me to say the following:

1. Whatever Jesus teaches is true.

2. Jesus taught that we are to “go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”(Matt 28:19).

3. Therefore, Christians should desire to “ go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,  and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”(Matt 28:19).

My question is the following: What does Jesus say about those who want to not be part of community or be accountable to a local congregation?

Conclusion

Jesus was a religious Jew who practiced the Judaism of his day. Granted, I don’t think Jesus came to start a new religion. I have discussed this elsewhere.  Jesus’  main teaching was about the Kingship of God. In the end, for Christians who continually say “I’m spiritual, but not religious” need to rethink their position.

Sources:

1.Anthony J. Saldarini, Was Jesus a Jew? Available at http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/people-cultures-in-the-bible/was-jesus-a-jew/

2. Paul Copan and Craig A. Evans. Who Was Jesus? A Jewish-Christian Dialogue. Louisville: KY.Westminster John Knox Press. 2001, 84-85.

3. Ibid, 84-85.

4. Chosen People Ministries, Jewish Roots, Available at http://www.chosenpeople.com/main/jewish-roots/245-in-what-ways-did-jesus-live-as-a-jew

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Would Jesus Say “I’m Spiritual, But Not Religious?”

  1. stevekerp July 10, 2015 / 11:53 pm

    Semantics.

    “Religion” is a very small box within Christianity: “visit widows and orphans in their affliction, and keep yourself unspotted from the world.” According to James, that’s “pure and undefiled religion.” This is never offered or suggested as a basis for justification.

    “Religion” is a co-opted term. It usually means activities or lifestyle to gain favor with God, or “man working his way to God.” As such, it’s an insult to Christ and His finished work on Calvary. It’s tantamount to saying, “what You did wasn’t good enough.”

    If “religion” is taken to mean “living out your faith in the context of community” then that should be said. Apparently, to chab123 it has something to do with “joining a church” – often (almost always) a 501(c)3 religious organization.

    By categorizing Christianity as a “religion” it puts the Church (in the Biblical sense) on common ground with all the other religions: Buddhist, Shinto, Islam, Confucianism, Catholicism, etc. True Christianity is in a class by itself. I think the Church is denigrated by calling it a “religion” or even “religious community”.

    You might want to re-visit Matthew 23:2-3. Jesus was telling His followers to obey Moses; He clearly indicated the additional requirements, laws and traditions should be rejected, as He rejected them.

    I seriously doubt that Jesus would join a “church” in America. In fact, I’m rather inclined to think that He would not be welcome, nor would Paul.

    Yes, we are to live out our faith in the context of community, but that does not mean a weekly liturgical meeting on Sunday mornings, or “worship services” or about 95 % of the stuff that comes with “church” in America.

    • chab123 July 11, 2015 / 12:25 am

      Hi Steve, thanks for your comments. I am well aware of those definitions. I am more concerned about the rugged individualism I see with alot of Christians. They generally justify this with saying “I am spiritual and not religious.” Yes, I have heard it many times. The ekklesia (the called out ones), is the Body of Christ. If someone wants to meet in a building or someone else (a home or wherever), that is no problem to me. I am just more concerned about the fact that many Christians think they don’t need to participate in community at all. I am well aware that there are many kinds of churches that Jesus might not approve of. For that matter, there was no Christianity when he came and it became a larger institutionalized religion much later. Anyway,have a nice weekend.

  2. stevekerp July 11, 2015 / 2:30 pm

    As I noted, I think it’s more semantics than real disagreement. I certainly can’t disagree with your response. Jesus lived a life that was fully integrated with the will of the Father. I can only wonder if anyone ever asked Jesus if He considered Himself “religious,” but He certainly took strong exception to the “religious practices” of His day, as we ought with ours. Ritualized or symbolic “fellowship” has done nothing to equip saints, build authentic community, or preserve the culture. Your observation that “many Christians think they don’t need to participate in community at all” probably needs examination. We are social beings by nature. Perhaps the problem is that Christians see little need for “Christian community” – thinking that having friends in the world is sufficient. On the other hand, getting all the Christian youth in your church together for a trip to the water park isn’t “Christian community” either – it’s simply enjoying worldly activities with other Christians. I’m looking forward to your subsequent posts on this topic. Very best, Steve

  3. rolledupsleeves July 11, 2015 / 3:36 pm

    The three points/axioms you state under Individualism v Community are interesting to me. I am familiar with churches where Christians faithfully attend for 10, 20 and 30 years without looking like they have become functioning disciples. I’m not very familiar with places where response to these points is actually being accomplished.

    What people mostly are is religious but not spiritual, in or out of churches.

    • chab123 July 12, 2015 / 1:45 am

      Rolled up sleeves, great points. I agree that discipleship is a problem. I think many people can come to faith in the Lord and then never understand anything about discipleship. That’s not what Jesus taught (Matt 28:19).

  4. dude July 12, 2015 / 12:14 am

    For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.

  5. Darcy April 2, 2017 / 11:29 am

    “Jesus observed the Jewish Feasts of His day”

    Very good post!

    And we must not ignore one of the main elements of social integration and prevention of individualism: Jesus and his disciples always kept the Sabbath (God/Jesus commandment),
    which is not a Jewish feast, but a creation / an example of God/Jesus for all men
    (Mark 2:27-28, Gen. 2:1-3, John 1:1-2) especially his people / his church (1 Co. 10:4) in all ages (Rev. 11:19, Rev. 14:12).
    God bless!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s